Nowadays young people deliberately damage public places. Why is it happening? What could be solution for it
In today’s world , there is a rising phenonmenon of young people engaging in vandalistic activities,mostly targeting public properties. From my perspective, various factors can be ascribed to this kind of behaviour, and society can take steps to mitigate with the problem.
To begin with, there are many contributors to vandalism. First of all, vandalism can stem from the lack of social activities in the area. The youth, by nature are energetic, meaning that they always seek for activities to help release their energy, or simply relieve boredom. Another causing factor of vandalistic behaviour derives from the youth low self-esteem.This is due to the fact that some young people are in the belief that they can become impressive by causing damage to properties. Finally, vandalism can be instrumental, which is a behaviour , or an action to achieve a specific goal such as stealing items in order to sell.
However, there are several actions that society can take to deal with the problem described above. The first solution would be to make young vandalisers responsible for the crime that they commited. This should be based on the severity of the damage , and the appropriate age to receive punishment. Moreover, young people who committed vandalism should be reeducated. This can discourage them from reoffending. The second measure would involve the state investing in youth services facilities such as sports club, or social groups. This would allow the youth to channel their energy not only better, but also more efficiently.
In sum, the reasons for young people to vandalise vary. However, various measures can be taken to tackle the issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In today’s world , there is a rising phenonmenon of young ...
^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , mostly
...eople engaging in vandalistic activities,mostly targeting public properties. From my pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... derives from the youth low self-esteem.This is due to the fact that some young peop...
^^^^
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that some young people are in the belief that they can become impressive by causi...
^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...an be instrumental, which is a behaviour , or an action to achieve a specific goal...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution would be to make young vandalisers responsible for the crime that they comm...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d be based on the severity of the damage , and the appropriate age to receive puni...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, kind of, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25939849624 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89817426132 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4825755332 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4375 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176516198986 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611865533194 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660663717923 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121683015297 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323050923132 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.