In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Transportation is one of the essential factor for today and also it is a indicator of development. Some people believe that government should spend huge funding on building railways for fast track trains to connect different cities, while some argue that first the concern department should focus on upgrading existing transport service. I partially agree on this statement and my essay will examine the arguments on favour and against on the topic.
To begin with, the advantage of spending more on high speed modern train is that, people can easily reach to the long distance at time. However, it can be useful to the average level people who cannot afford airlines, while with the easy access of train service, citizen of one city can travel to another for their better job offer easily. Similarly, another important part of modern train is, it help to save the environment from noise and air pollution. For example, train can transport huge number of passenger in one time, so other small buses are less needed, which help to prevent noise pollution as well as air. Furthermore, the less consumption of fuel and comfort of passenger is another merit of modern transport. So, to enjoy all this facilities people always want to travel on modern vehicle.
On other hand, we cannot deny the condition of existing vehicle in the town. So, the government should give priority on improving condition of recently running transport at same time. For instance, if the recently working fleet are in bad condition or old, then this can polluted the environment with noise and smoke. Moreover, the road accident may increase due to the condition of road and transport both. While, new railways cannot reach all places of town, so by upgrading existing public transport government should make easy access to all citizen.
In conclusion, the modern service must also be added in town which help to provide service faster, but improvement of public vehicle is necessary to prevent road accident and save the environment as well.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sential factor for today and also it is a indicator of development. Some people b...
^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'connecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: connecting
...building railways for fast track trains to connect different cities, while some argue that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...r important part of modern train is, it help to save the environment from noise and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition of road and transport both. While, new railways cannot reach all places of ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57505668872 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.31126246 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21956842473 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677037374015 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551735229862 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129522129146 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473486962523 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.