In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
In recent years, the means of transportation had improved towards speed and efficiency. A section of society thought that governments need to spend huge amount of money on cutting edge railway's system which much faster than existing system while other thought that authorities spend significant proportion on public roads to improve it. in the course of the essay, I will describe both side coin.
On the one hand, people thought that modern system of railways are much faster than the cars, due this speed we are able to save over time. Modern railcars had 5 times faster with capacity take significant number people along from one stop to other stop. Even though, rails do not face traffic problems which is normal these days. Nowadays, trains are much cheaper than its prodesesser and environment friendly because railways are derived by electric drive system which is not expensive and safe environment. The electricity produces by renewable sources. Due to these factor the spending on modern transport system is valuable.
On the other hand, people argue that the society have public cars and other things that use roads. The train depends on time and it is accessable to each city while existing public means of transportation gives option to go anywhere and anytime. People are used to the old ways of transport. The new fast train is no economically effective to go on old routes. Due to this government need to spend on improvement of old public transport.
In conclusion, I believe that both are important to a country, government develop new train between most populated cities and improve other cities' transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...nd huge amount of money on cutting edge railways system which much faster than existing ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...most populated cities and improve other cities transportation.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09665427509 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69742502538 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561338289963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1469148931 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264576251893 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807298797599 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580571249061 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166935256703 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547438027543 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.