In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In some countries, many people hold the view that current public transport needs to be upgraded by spending much money. In contrast, other people say that money should be spent on building new railway lines for very fast and modern trains to connect each region. According to my way of thinking, money should be used for constructing new railway lines.
On the one hand, today people tend to prefer that the government ought to use budget to construct new modern trains which very convenient for the resident and I agree. The reason is it can carry a larger number of passengers as well as goods at the same time, besides that contribute significantly to the reduction of the traffic jam and personal vehicles like cars. Furthermore, the new trains are applied to a variety of technologies which is to make trains faster, safer and save a lot of time. Therefore, the construction of new trains have greatly improved the community and lifestyle of each region and it's also bringing so many advantages for developing a country. For instance, Japan is one of the countries have a plenty of modern train systems for connecting cities and countrysides, in cities most citizens choose trains as the main transportation due to the numerous benefits that the trains bring to them.
On the other hand, some people support the opinion that the public transport needs to prioritize to be enhanced, the reason is this structure still plays an essential role in linking the different parts of cities and most of the percentage of people use this system to travel to different places. In other words, the fund for upgrading or building public transport systems are less expensive. As an illustration, in the UK where combine to use both trains and public transport in life but the public transport is still taking the main part to citizens.
In conclusion, I totally believe that the national budget needs to spend on both new railway lines and public transport. Nevertheless, trains will have an important role to develop a country in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90462427746 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71111360715 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0040432563 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.538461538 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7692307692 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398580780606 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14641362145 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967905861513 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250584572745 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129671880175 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.