In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport.
In this modern era, we cannot ignore the importance of communication between one city to another. according to certain number of people it can be done by improving the existing public transport infrastructure and others belief that building fresh train system will be more effective. I think improving public transport that is already running maybe cheaper but investing heavily on railways will yield more benefit in the long run.
Upgrading the public transport service by retrofitting all the busses can be a cheaper and quicker solution to this. This fact is true to many countries who cannot bear the cost of new train tracks. On top of that being cheaper any country can improve this without taking any loan from any other countries. Such as, Bangladesh improved its highways from Dhaka to Chittagong without any foreign loan. For that reason this strategies is more suitable for any country with tight budget.
That being said, upgrading existing transport system maybe cheaper but building new trains tracks between cities is always better than anything. If any country uses latest state of the art technology to build train tracks, that will be unparalleled to anything with out dated technology. However this may cost more but the level of quality we will get is second to none. Japan's bullet train can be a proper example, they spend a lot of money along with the latest technology and the result is blistering fast train system that can travel several times faster that anything existed before. Thus, building train line will always be more efficient than anything.
In conclusion, upgrading transport system that is already present can be easier but building train system is better in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...munication between one city to another. according to certain number of people it can be d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...thout any foreign loan. For that reason this strategies is more suitable for any cou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'uses the latest'.
Suggestion: uses the latest
...ys better than anything. If any country uses latest state of the art technology to build tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...an anything. If any country uses latest state of the art technology to build train tracks, that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
..., that will be unparalleled to anything with out dated technology. However this may cost...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... to anything with out dated technology. However this may cost more but the level of qua...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49347017052 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.253323923 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23387578085 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791357355236 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584751638095 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1370408919 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570812255056 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.