There is a debatable issue regarding budget allocation for transportation sector in certain countries, whether it should be allocated for establishing mass rapid train lines or should be expensed for advancement of existing public transports. I prefer it should be used for maintaining current public transport with both views described below.
On one hand, expensing remarkable amount of money for constructing new railway lines will give benefits for commuters, who have to make daily journey from their homes, located in suburban area, to their workplaces, situated in center of the town. This is because commuter lines relatively faster rather than other public vehicles like buses and public cars. As a result, the customers of public transports spend less time journey and arrive in their destination on time without trapped by congestion. For example, in Jakarta, capital city of Indonesia, most of employees form small cities around it, such as Depok, Bogor and Bekasi, use mass rapid transport for daily commuting since it is the most effective public transports for them. Thus, the numbers of new railway trains should be improved.
On other hand, the expenditure for transportation should be spent for existing public transports, such as planes and ships, especially in archipelago countries. This is because most of islands on those countries relatively unreachable due to lack of public transport facilities to go there. Improving public transport sectors on the kind of transportation, the other sectors like education, economic, and social could be same with other region. Moreover, it can reduce the gap of condition between center of government regions and boundary areas. For instance, Republic of Indonesia government, currently, is developing sea transportation and air transportation to reach islands where located on boundary areas in order to keep monitor the latest condition there and make them accessible by surrounding regions like island in Maluku province. Hence, it is prominent to build existing public transports in those countries.
In short, although it might seems sensible that making budget expenditure for trains, I believe, in certain countries, allocate it for improving current transport vehicles will be more effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the employees') or simply say ''most employees''.
Suggestion: most of the employees; most employees
... in Jakarta, capital city of Indonesia, most of employees form small cities around it, such as De...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the islands') or simply say ''most islands''.
Suggestion: most of the islands; most islands
... archipelago countries. This is because most of islands on those countries relatively unreachab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, in short, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55043227666 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9475309344 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1960023028 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275116705122 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108659936359 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721264236612 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17155465082 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507069906139 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.