Offices, schools and buildings should be located in different areas, in the view of some people.
Do advantage outweigh disadvantage?
The issue of whether it is more enjoyable for city dwellers to have buildings relocated into specific areas or not remains a source of controversy. While there is a strong case for the latter view, I am more inclined to the former.
On the one hand, those against mass construction of offices, schools, shops and homes in seperated areas may state their reasons as follows. The first and foremost explanation would be the difficulties in travel arrangements, making citizens consume a considerable amount of time. For example, metropolitan parents will find it inconvenient to travel between schools and offices in order to pick up their children after classes. Moreover, it is also believed that this strategy can cause traffic congestion during peak time due to long-distance travel.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that this new urban design would bring three obvious advantages. First of all, this provides citizens greater convenience if we want to access a specific area for a single purpose. For example, whenever we go shopping, we can easily get around to purchase whatever we want without travelling to different destinations. Another noticeable benefit of this policy would be a more secure living environment, which can be considered as a deterrent against crimes. With the shops are located far from private houses, it is unlikely for thefts and burglaries to take place. Finally, as schools and offices are located far from crowded areas such as shopping areas, students and officers would not suffer from distraction or any attention deficit disorders, fostering work and study productivity.
In conclusion, it undeniable that constructing buildings in different areas has its pros and cons. However, I am more inclined to the benefits this strategy would create in terms of convenience and practicality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28040540541 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91947997298 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1337634167 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104638667143 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342042501748 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285246459601 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594018966549 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121052220651 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.