One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees. The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking more refugees.
To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Migration mostly derived from anarchism and political crises has become one of the most puzzling issues in the world. Multitudes of resolutions have been voiced in an attempt to salvage the unmitigated unrest; one of the most epitomic is that developed countries will take more refugees. However, from my perspective, that jury only stokes oil into smothering fire and instigates uncalled-for repercussions.
One of the most potholes that will soon arise is the asylum and sources of food. Where these governments can shelter these fugitives who aren’t purportedly tailored to be there is not a temporary problem. Foreigners flocking to these countries on a labile basis with an amble of people can beget chaos and hysteria, for no authorities can prepare aid forthrightly. If a country can’t redress the conundrum properly, it will receive vilification while more citizens will die for nothing. But if any countries repudiate this meritorious honor, they will be regarded unethical and base. To do or not to do becomes a dilemma. In addition, even if refugees succeed in dwelling in these new lands, no one can output the ratio of their liabilities of finding jobs to make ends meet or how they can avoid racial segregation as this abrupt intrusion of strangers can egg on competition between natives and foreigners.
Moreover, there is also a latent threat of terrorism-affiliated reactions if any of the fugitives feel disgraced and treated unfairly. To extenuate the feasibility of this, some governments, like Greek, set up precincts to confine immigrants for fear that among them skulks a menace that can threaten the safety of the country. This action is condemned; it’s still a necessary step, though, to make sure that no one new in these countries can pose untoward risks to others.
In conclusion, instead of pinning much hope on other countries, people in chaotic governments should defend themselves because nobody will become their saviors but themselves. Black communities save themselves through revolts, and they perhaps should steer towards the same path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstigates uncalled-for repercussions. One of the most potholes that will soon ...
^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rise is the asylum and sources of food. Where these governments can shelter these fug...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition between natives and foreigners. Moreover, there is also a latent threat ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es can pose untoward risks to others. In conclusion, instead of pinning much h...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should steer towards the same path.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29129129129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97853091661 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63963963964 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0355844482 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135939042889 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416404092516 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278174577336 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687493971675 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026994408739 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.