Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Is it a positive or negative development?
Online Shopping has been capturing significant public attention in recent decades, raising many questions of its implications on consumers’ shopping pattern. Although the benefits associated could be pronounced, the downsides could justify these.
On the one hand, there are many positive impacts when it comes to electronic commerce. First, online shopping is one of the most efficient and inexpensive way to purchase items. Before the appearance of such manner, individuals were subject to private vehicles for physical travels to stores and outlets, costing unnecessary time, money and effort. Second, since online-purchasing websites feature international shipping, users especially those in developing nations are given accessibility to foreign goods from developed ones, which are proved to be of higher quality and lower retail prices. For example, Vietnamese individuals have a penchant for ordering high-end garments from international clothing websites such as Asos, Channel and Mango rather than purchasing at the retail outlets because the ordered prices with the shipping fees are overall relatively lower in comparison, reducing significant monetary expenditure.
On the other hand, such shopping pattern could be fraught with many pitfalls. From the environmental perspective, in order to keep pace with the growing fast-delivery demand, significant automobile dependency with the co-ordination of air cargo, container shipping and land logistics would be the condition precedent, This could culminate in the explosion in exhausted fumes in the environment, followed by increased carbon concentrations, making environmental deterioration an inevitable product. From the consumers’ perspective, without physical interaction with the desired products, consumers could not have the gauge n the actual quality and be deceived into purchasing stemming from false portrayals and fraudulent misrepresentations, thereby winding up buying second-rate products with prohibitively expensive costs.
In conclusion, the development of online shopping could be both advantageous and disadvantageous. However, by taking fuel efficient shipping alternatives and buyers’ higher degree of caution, online purchasing could be the most optimal option for effective shopping in the long terms.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23052959502 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34526643821 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644859813084 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.554421198 49.4020404114 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.666666667 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181216499362 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886621096076 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931891770019 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13586047782 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713782862764 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.15 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.47 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.