The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the demand for moving from home to other places should be limited to lower the number of traffic in metropolises. While I agree with this solution for participants transportation, I do not believe that this is an effective way to restrict the traffic problem.
On the one hand, I absolutely think that the requirement of travelling should be shrunk. Firstly, at rush hours that people tend to go to work or school, there is a huge amount of vehicles on the street and that directly predispose to traffic accidents. Therefore, due to the hi-tech, people can work at home such as learning through the online course, distance meeting and so on to decrease the number of drivers. Secondly, not only the deceleration of traffic but also an important way to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that transport produces is to encourage and enable people to travel less. As a result, to reduce traffic and accidents will also strongly affect the environment.
On the other hand, the aforementioned reasons can be seen as the opposite angle. One reason is doing work at home cannot ensure the efficiency of work. Moreover, it is impossible for some areas like police, doctor, so they have to go to work daily. Another reason is discussing the work through the technology gradually leads to the downfall of communication and they routinely do not express the full emotion to others. By and large, the demand limit for drivers would be disadvantageous for many people.
In conclusion, while there are many drawbacks to solve transport matters for drivers, I do believe that this is a necessary rule.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93795620438 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86655309475 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558394160584 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7009471927 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273734452704 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854862799985 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486956255817 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142769153038 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634417043616 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.