Organised tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for people and environment.
Visitors are thriving to explore remote areas and since these areas are far from the cities organising tours to such areas is becoming popular recently. However, personally I feel that this is a positive development for the locals and will still remain positive to environment if few measures are taken correctly. This essay will discuss about opportunities generated to inhabitants by such tours and probable negative effects of the same.
To begin, it will bring fame to that area, thus making its history and culture known to the world; hence, making its existence prominent. A case in point, village in Goa had a nice history and it submerges and was abandoned by villagers to build dam, it became famous through tours and publicising it online. Moreover, locals will get a chance of promoting their business and creative art. For instance, remote areas are rich in tradition and artefacts: fishing nets, lanterns made out of wood, caps made of bamboos. Unfortunately, these crafts have less recognition and fades away with generations, such tours can help in preserving such art. Furthermore, these areas are deprived of business, keeping their capital low. They mostly thrive on family business like fishing or farming or seasonal occupation. Organised tours in such cases can be like a ray of hope providing year-round business like running restaurants, tour guides etcetera.
In contrast to this, certain factors can have negative impact on communities and environment. Firstly, unthreaded roads embracing wild grass will be gone, destroying scenic beauty. Secondly, amount of garbage produced will be increased which calls for efficient waste management. Thirdly, locals might lose interest in family business due to the interest in evergreen business provided by tours. Fourthly, rise in competition may affect harmony. Generally, remote areas are known for their simplicity. People are satisfied and they work to survive without longing for luxurious life trend might flip making people to be more competitive over years. Nevertheless, this can be avoided with understanding and management.
Negative effects add bulk to positive impacts if addressed properly. Hence, to recapitulate, although, organised tours have deleterious effects on communities advantages outweighs the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, i feel, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55367231638 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8869904474 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612994350282 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7708403388 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.619047619 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90476190476 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33861736905 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770629821456 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713105802012 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194488855712 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684849343121 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.