Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
Tourism services offered at disadvantaged area have been increasingly prevalent over the past few years. While I accept that this tendency can bring about a number of advantages, I believe that it still exerts several negative impacts.
On the one hand, there are an excessive load of benefits when citizens wander off the beaten tracks. To begin with, their travel is believed to boost local economy and create more jobs. Indeed, as revealed by recent studies, tourists tend to break the bank for a holiday of the lifetime, so this may contribute to a massive influx of money poured into the destination’s budget, along with an enormous demand for employees in the service sector. In addition, the more residents visit a region, the more likely it is to stimulate interest in preservation and construction. Particularly, if it comes to the authorities’ knowledge that travel is financially advantageous, they may allocate their resources to renovate or build more facilities to enhance the experience for visitors in hopes of optimizing revenue, of which local citizens can simultaneously take advantage.
On the other hand, tours to remote areas are also recognised to be detrimental because of discernible reasons. From an environment perspective, many tourists lacking of social conscience has been witnessed to ruin a tourism site by littering, smoking or tearing off flowers, which left the destination polluted and devastated when they ended their trips. Therefore, it is safe to say that these locals’ scenery depletion was undoubtedly attributed to travelers. Furthermore, from a culture perspective, it was their lack of respects to local culture and tradition that deprives residents of social tranquility. Specifically, a number of visitors as well as behave inappropriately towards others at public places, and this may pose threats to security, or even result in a loss of moral and religious values.
Briefly, it seems to me that although traveling to less well-known regions is beneficial, its drawbacks should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...still exerts several negative impacts. On the one hand, there are an excessive ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns can simultaneously take advantage. On the other hand, tours to remote areas...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a loss of moral and religious values. Briefly, it seems to me that although tr...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its drawbacks should not be overlooked.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38699690402 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14010041505 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.969038152 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.846153846 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101884662701 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311155292795 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246040549102 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471667427645 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280298976245 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.