In the past most families ate together in the evening and the food was almost always cooked at home Nowadays however many families rarely eat together every day and often the food is bought outside the house or supplied by catering What are the reaso

In today's modern society, people lead increasingly busy lives, which has resulted in changes to their eating habits. Instead of cooking and enjoying meals together at home, many families now opt to purchase food from outside sources and do not eat together. This essay will discuss the factors influencing this change in eating habits and analyze the trend of eating out.

In the past, it was common for families to gather for dinner after a hectic day. This was a precious time for everyone to share their day and emotions while enjoying homemade dishes that were both cost-effective and nutritious. Despite the simplicity of these meals, they created invaluable moments. I personally cherished the cozy atmosphere of family dinners, a tradition my own family maintained until I went abroad to study.

Today, the fast-paced lifestyle has impacted the quality of meals for individuals and households. Consider a family of four, each member with their own responsibilities and commitments. Some may have deadlines to meet at school or work, leaving them with no choice but to order food from restaurants. Others may have business meetings over dinner, and some may not have time for a proper meal and resort to quick options like sandwiches or hamburgers to sustain themselves while working. This has led to the proliferation of restaurants offering take-out services such as McDonald's, Subway, and Lotteria, catering to the demand for fast food despite its higher cost.

In conclusion, while the fast-paced environment of today's society has benefitted fast-food businesses financially, it has also had negative implications for family dynamics and communication. Family meals, once a time for sharing and bonding, are becoming increasingly rare. Additionally, home-cooked meals are often more flavorful and economical. Therefore, while the trend of eating out may be convenient in the short term, it has adverse effects on family relationships and overall well-being.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39805825243 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97079975372 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640776699029 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8107890122 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222713297816 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706121195077 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069558987567 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136769693675 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477899575825 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.