In the past, most people used to travel to their place of work. With increased use of computers, the internet and smart phones, more and more people are starting to work from home.
Instead of travelling to work, numerous people are beginning their work home with computers, smartphones, or some other devices connect to the internet. Although this has some benefits, there are also some drawbacks.
The main advantages are that not only full of economical profits but also rises in productivity growth and simplicity. For instance, many people do not need to spend several hours to take the traffics to work and go back. Moreover, this also saves an amount for transports expenses. In addition, working from home may be more flexible than traditional working when they have their own comfortable and convenient atmosphere. That makes work’s efficiency is increased too. Therefore, the process of documents’ transmission has become more convenient and faster. For example, they can use email for sending files.
Nevertheless, this trend exist some disadvantages. Working at home can be lonely. There are no colleagues to talk to or help you when you have a problem that cannot solve. This may cause to lack of communication between workmates, and decreasing communication skills and the ability to work within groups. Despite you can connect with them by zoom, skype or facebook, these still bring some difficulties and are affected considerably. Furthermore, there are lots of jobs that demand physical presence, and perhaps this cause imbalance and lead to some problems in work.
To summarise, there are some positive and negative respects of working from home. This can provide a high productivity rate and easier life. However, some things will be done better with people around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lack of communication between workmates, and decreasing communication skills and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32156862745 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87553949939 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0633841472 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3888888889 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274533087452 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785676810553 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843910531583 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16875896907 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617947488269 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.