People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
Currently, the number of individuals consuming sugary beverage is increasing. Reasons for the occurrence of this trend and solutions for reducing soft drink consumption will be mentioned in this essay.
There are several reasons why people have the tendency to consume these drinks. Because sugar-based beverages often have a great number of addictive ingredients, they might be irresistible. For example, Red Bulls contain a huge amount of caffeine, which is a highly addictive substance. Additionally, people often mentally associate these drinks as a source of energy because of sugary ingredients in these drinks can stimulate people for a while, make them become more vigorous. Last but not least, the widespread beverage marketing as the beverage companies spend heavily to promote these drinks. For example, advertisements made by these companies might be exaggerated and very colorful, which would attract a great number of children.
The excessive of sugar-containing drink consumption can be solved with several measures. The first solution is raising individual awareness. By conducting a survey to encourage people reduce their soft drink intake and eat or drink healthier sustenance. Another solution is the media should stop having beverage commercial. Therefore, people would not see any of these commercials, and they would not consume any soft drinks. Last but not least, since offspring is the one that easily influenced by these advertisements, they need to be guided and supervised. This would lead to reduction in the amount of soft drinks consumed by children.
In conclusion, the overuse of sugar-based drinks results from the need of individuals and the media. Therefore, each person and the governments should take some effective measures to minimize the consumption of soft drink because it is essential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52669039146 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02671497393 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.886824909 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3529411765 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345962753897 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101150045462 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861607609184 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20412163688 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026017400483 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.