People suggest increasing taxes on processed products to improve people's health. What do you think?
That a lot of processed food and drink products are comprised of high levels of sugar which can pose deplorable repercussions to people’s health is a pressing issue, whose absolute resolution is nowhere to be found. Some people suggest these sugarcoated things be levied pricier to bail the increase in sugar consumption. In my estimation, that’s a good idea, yet it can’t solve this entrenched trend to the root.
Imposing more tariffs on sugary products can make everyone take the price tags into consideration; hence, they will cease to purchase these. The indigent or the underpaid can afford some 5-7-dollar beverages, but they will mull it over if the prices are more than that about 3-4 dollars. Without a doubt, the number of consumption is going to nose-dive.
The price can only influence the destitute; nevertheless, it takes no toll on the well-heeled and the affluent, who won’t be bothered with even 10 dollars, let alone 3-4. Should they feel flush, they can fritter away the money in their pockets and lavish on any occasions they fancy. Even though the rich are known to concern for their appearances and won’t take in anything detrimental to their constitutions, it remains to be seen whether they’ll take the crackdown of the government in this ticklish matter seriously.
Furthermore, the manufacturing industry is flourishing in its prime, as it has become one of the most prosperous industries in the world and contributes significantly to the country. If this industry is wreaked havoc, no one knows what turmoil can occur.
In conclusion, I can assert that this method will work to some extent; however, the issue is nothing short of a conundrum that needs taking better and more decisive measures, such as gradual edification, which can mitigate the grave ramifications and tweak the purview of people more effectually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment in this ticklish matter seriously. Furthermore, the manufacturing industry ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15460526316 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92124340001 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634868421053 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9147238986 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101583933218 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374208610497 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596947407984 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566435482272 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708899192962 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.