People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
These days, the environment problem has been drawing public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for means of transportation should be applied or not is a controversial issue. I totally agree with increasing fuel from the government with its many benefits.
There are several reasons to explain why many holds belief that boosting the price of fuel could bring many advantages. First and Foremost, the charge of material is grown up which can generate a good opportunity for public transport to turn back and develop more. The reason is that facing the risk of being forgotten and pushed to the brink of bankruptcy. Secondly, the increasing cost of fuel that helps lift people out of many accidents because people have to decline considerably the number of journeys, which spurs an inevitable blessing of being limited many unfortunate accidents in the life.
Nevertheless, the increasing materials make a contribution to addressing the crippling problem which is air pollution. Firstly, when the residents could minimize materials for their cars or other vehicles in the sense that the congestion could decrease. As a result, it is also the main culprit of promoting the quality of the atmosphere that leads to shaping the healthy life of people. Finally, it is understood that people realize easily the importance of the environment. This means that people may provide incentives or organize some events to enhance people’s awareness of protecting the environment.
In conclusion, the government need to implement this method with the objectives which are not only saving the environment but also advancing the good life of people.
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...blem has been drawing public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for mean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28358208955 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90943342447 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5456246577 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257067408145 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765418584843 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577252340066 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136816010679 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760696239783 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.