People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The maintenance of outdated buildings has been highlighted as an emerging issue, raising many questions of its necessity. Given the suggestion that old buildings should be replaced by modern ones, I partially agree.
On the one hand, the upkeep of old constructions could bestow positive benefits. First, it is proved that in many nations, especially culturally rich ones, religion beliefs, customs and original ancient architectural styles are mainly manifested through old constructions. If these historically and culturally significant old sites were demolished, it would be the utter rejection of national culture. From the economic perspective, due to old buildings’ cultural importance, they could be utilized as tourism spots. For example, Vietnamese tourism department has undertaken initiatives, maintaining and renovating the old harbours and surrounding feudal style houses from 17 century, attracting millions of visitors, feeding into increased national revenues.
However, it is true that some old buildings should be destroyed, giving way for modern olds. Specifically, because outdated constructions are designed and installed with less advanced materials and architectural technologies than modern ones, they could be susceptible to deterioration though time, making dilapidation or collapse inevitable products, rasing problems of safety. For instance, death casualties in the infamous Japanese earthquake disaster in 2011 mainly stemmed from the old constructrions’ collapse with concrete cracks falling onto civilians, which has been addresed by Japanese disaster relief agency by setting up modern buildings with special foundations with compressed air in order that homes levitate when the earth shake.
In conclusion, I believe that only old constructions with deteriorated structures which could pose as a safety menace to civilians should be demolished while those with cultural significance could be maintained and retrofitted. Additionally, it is governments’ responsibility to decide on which old sites should be removed for the ultimate long-term interests of the national citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...surrounding feudal style houses from 17 century, attracting millions of visitors, feedi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10299003322 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37375047233 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641196013289 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3201405621 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.083333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204271658156 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915392491861 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812092296302 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133732964997 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267410497428 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.4 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.