People who cause their own illnesses through unhealthy lifestyles and poor diets should have to pay more for health care.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Living unhealthily, lack of exercise, imbalanced eating are some reasons that lead to illnesses to people. While some people do not need to use medical treatment, some people have to use it. In my point of view, people who make themselves ill because of unhealthy lifestyles and poor diets need to lay out more for health care.
The fact that there is no excuse for being unaware of the sequels of living detrimentally. Information about health and fitness is wisely available on the Internet, on posters, on television. Additionally, there are also some TV programmes about how to be in good physical condition. Furthermore, health care services are being developed significantly so that people can consult advices from doctor, sport trainer or nutritionist. We have health propaganda from government, organizations, quality health care services hence people must have responsibilty for being physically fit and should not receive free or reduced health care services.
Besides, the development of medical treatment goes hand in hand with the increase of payment so it is inequitable to let people who do not care about their own health require treatment with the same payment with others. In other words, they are taking money and life away from another patient, whose treatment is compulsory although it is high-priced. Rising the cost of health care could be a good solution to make people more conscious of keeping fit. It also narrows down medical burden and saves more money for other patients who are having bad physical condition.
In conclusion, paying more for health services is necessary to people who live unhealthily and have poor diets. It not only helps people raise awareness of their bad lifestyles but also reduces financial and medical burden for other patients
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17993079585 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79438277423 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0996208441 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338121799612 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11226415979 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937402989817 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215688247146 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415004710333 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.