the performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. what can companies do to increase staff productivity
It is indisputable that the performance of employees is a determinant to a successful business. From my point of view, there are some measures that should be taken to improve staff productivity in workplace.
One simply way to increase working efficiency at workplace is to offer employees bonuses and incentives based on employees’ performance. Providing bonus and incentive payouts to employees seems to put a strain on companies’ financial budget in the short term. However, such additional incomes apart from fixed salaries act as rewards and recognition of the contributions of employees and therefore would help boosting employees’ morale and stimulate them to dedicate themselves to companies they work for which in turn would benefit the companies in the long run. Moreover, some other non-financial benefits and preferences such as healthcare insurances, annual travelling and tourism as well as student grants for employees’ children should also be carefully considered.
Beside wellfare, a good working condition is another essential factor for high productivity. As working environment is closely related to mental health and creativity of human, creating a friendly, fresh and stimulating space for work is one priority of enterprises in terms of increasing working efficiency. For example, in some big audit firms such as KPMG and EY, plants and flowers are grown to make green and stimulated workplaces, which reduce the pressure and stress levels that audit job brings.
In conclusion, Due to the importance of staff productivity to the success of companies, I believe that some mentioned above measures could be applied to increase efficiency in working.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to boost' or 'boost'.
Suggestion: to boost; boost
...s of employees and therefore would help boosting employees' morale and stimulate th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59302325581 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27424875132 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3746067949 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.3 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106894236549 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494970743284 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528498987414 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920855704965 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665546803258 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.