A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
İn modern world, the way of qualifying people has been changed hugely, the wealth and social status of human started to play tremendous role in judgement of person. The main characteristics as honor, kindness and trust have lost their importance. Unfortunately, I agree that the primary worth of material possessions and social status has started to be considered as main properties in human judgement. İn this essay, I am going to support my idea by giving examples and draw conclusion.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that there is big difference in activities which has been done by rich and destitute people. When poor person struggles to help and tries to devote everything that he or she possess in order to aid somebody, this action is not considered as more valuable by surroundings. However, if wealthy one does help which can be even negligible, everyone accept it as massive help that is done by someone who has got higher social status. The aids and activities done by penniless but honorable, kind people is not accepted as help, but if the help which is next to none is done by wealthy person, his or her help is considered as more worthy.
On the other hand, a vast majority of people respects a man due to their mandatory status. A person who has got a plenty of possessions plays an important role in every parties and meetings. No one pays attention to honour, trust or kindness of that person, they only consider him or her as grand personality.
İn conclusion, it is evident that the wealth and social status of person holds main position in human judgement. I believe that this way of qualifying people is not right because everyone can gain power and be rich but not everybody can be real human or real person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...ies to devote everything that he or she possess in order to aid somebody, this action i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73770491803 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71548655677 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518032786885 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4034457167 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157424985808 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593069788017 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413835465678 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102443065539 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328291301751 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.