A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is an undeniable fact that individuals are judged according to their outlook, status in society as well as their possession. However, the qualities like kindness, honesty, and trustworthiness are absolutely disregarded. To a certain extent, I concur with this notion but I also believe that old-fashioned values still play a crucial role in our lives.
It is considered that we are living in a pop culture and a materialistic scenario in which each person is judgemental. Nowadays, the thing which is prioritized in the expensive things one own and their astonishing looks. This can be illustrated with the example of Kim Kardashian. Her reality television serials never show any kind of acting, instead, they are based on her luxurious cars and expensive mansions. Not just this, there are a plenty of celebrities who earn name and fame because of son/daughter of a wealthy family. For instance, Abhishek Bachan, an actor of Bollywood, is famous because of his assets.
On the flip side, Although the traditional values such as respect, integrity, enthusiasm are seen to be forgotten but it still plays an indispensable role in a plethora of societies and communities. Generally, employers are still searching for the traits which include hard working, determination, dedication. The outer looks, as well as materialistic things, does not assist in any way. Thus, it is essential to educate the adolescents about these positive characters of life.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, albeit people are judged according to the modern values but I do believe that traditional traits lend a helping hand in the development of individuals. Therefore, it is advisable for parents to equip their children with such qualities so that they can succeed in life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10512637225 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4402707637 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125785290087 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353794197182 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389456619924 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750162824488 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364380948503 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.