Nowadays, a number of countries have youthful population higher in comparison with the older ones. It's highly likely that this particular situation has both constructive and destructing sides. Yet, I believe that there are more pros of having young people compared to seniors in a country.
There are several positive aspects of having older people more than juveniles. Firstly, elderly people are more experienced than adults which is an imperative element of living a smooth life. From business's perspective, it's massively crucial to be experienced as they gets skilled people at workplace. Not only this, these ones are more trustworthy and reliable as they stick to their jobs for a longer span and even sometimes for entire of their lives. This is how they built trust strings with the companies they work for. While younger people especially new graduates often switches their jobs very frequently.
Despite these few benefits, I hold an opinion that youths are better placed to have the bright side. First of all, it is true that younger generation is more energetic, healthy and enthusiastic and so they can represent their best in physically demanding professions such as sports like cricket, boxing, athletic, etc. That is the reason why many sports people often gets retired after reaching the age of 30 or when they are in their 40s owing to the fact that they start to find it harder to continue doing physical exercises.
Secondly, from government's perspective, youngsters can contribute to boost the economy. For example, due to the fact that in many developing economies, more and more young people often migrate to another countries in order to make their living. Once they are in another country they send back money to their families and this money in the form of tax can contribute to the economy. Moreover, if there are more older people governments would have pay for the expenses for the health and care of the elderly. This can be either in the form of pension or building old age homes for their living.
In conclusion, although older people are experienced and reliable from certain aspects, there are more benefits of bearing young people.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...ively crucial to be experienced as they gets skilled people at workplace. Not only t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...led people at workplace. Not only this, these ones are more trustworthy and reliable as th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rings with the companies they work for. While younger people especially new graduates...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
... to the economy. Moreover, if there are more older people governments would have pay for t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, even so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05277777778 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5911039046 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552777777778 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.878206636 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.055555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163964469817 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571539606129 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504848189659 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106859116757 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732670724812 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...ively crucial to be experienced as they gets skilled people at workplace. Not only t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...led people at workplace. Not only this, these ones are more trustworthy and reliable as th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rings with the companies they work for. While younger people especially new graduates...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
... to the economy. Moreover, if there are more older people governments would have pay for t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, even so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05277777778 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5911039046 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552777777778 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.878206636 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.055555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163964469817 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571539606129 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504848189659 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106859116757 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732670724812 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.