Nowadays, some countries age demographics show that the number of young people is becoming increasingly higher in comparison with the number of the elderly. While there are persuasive arguments in favour of its benefits, I would argue that its drawbacks are far more.
Obviously, vital Human Resources are of paramount importance for any nations. Firstly, those who support this trend would claim that in this situation government would have far more access to human labor-force. Therefore, there will be no need for companies to be concern about the scarcity of workforce. Secondly, the more manpower, the better development could happen. Thus, the pace of advancement in such society would inevitably increase. As it can be seen in Iran. Finally, those powerful groups are able to provide their older fellow citizens with higher standards of living. Potentially, this situation contributes to higher longevity. For instance, China, where there are countless labor-force, embodies this idea perfectly.
on the other hand, there will be always another side of the coin if we investigate this trend in a more conscious way. First and foremost, if the current trend goes unchecked there will be high incidence for individuals to be unemployed. As a result, nepotism and favouritism will increase in seizing job opportunities. This problem will be compounded by the fact that young people should bear the burden of elderly citizens as well. Consequently, it will put them under severe strain at that important stage of their life. Furthermore, in such countries ‘brain drain’ is inevitable. Thus, younger generations would probably make a decision to emigrate to countries that these problems are less. For example, in middle eastern countries this situation is prevailing.
By and large, notwithstanding the fact that having more human resources would be beneficial for any society, I am of the opinion that the dire consequences of this trend overshadow its merits. Owing to the unemployment and hard economic climate that it can feasibly cause.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...such society would inevitably increase. As it can be seen in Iran. Finally, those ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...force, embodies this idea perfectly. on the other hand, there will be always an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39628482972 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9682346683 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.27057705 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.380952381 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7619047619 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134824583822 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384435326855 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553541245737 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862257251841 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527391022468 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.