It is undoubtedly true that currently certain countries are facing the large proportion of productive ages in comparison with older ages. I believe that the positive sides outweigh the negative sides with some evidences described below.
The drawback of this condition is increasing the number of unemployment in some countries, especially third-world countries. This is because the burst of population has not followed by the rise of job vacancy in those countries that make the number of jobless citizen. This evidence cause advance problems that burden those nations, such as increasing number of poverty and rising the percentage of crime. For instance, the large number of young adults in Brazil directly influence the number of assaults since the limited number of job vacancy there. Thus, this negative side should be considered by most of countries.
However, this condition lead to positive impact for providing productive human resources to help the development of the countries. This is since tat young adults always associate with strongly passionate and productive individual. Based on the opinion form human resources experts has shown that the large number of young ages will significantly impact on the improvement of countries in all aspects, especially economic and social aspects in long-term. This evidence has been predicted since long time ago in some developing countries like Indonesia and India that the number of neonatal birth relatively high. In the future both countries will be expected as the main power of economic due to the strength quantity and quality of human resources. Hence, the rising of productive ages will help in countries advancement.
In short, although it might seems sensible that the large number of young mature age individuals has drawbacks, I strongly believe that it has more benefits for countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...s negative side should be considered by most of countries. However, this condition lead to pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, third, thus, for instance, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4089347079 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78626565419 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4729563115 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3036821407 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101827018822 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558874783008 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170791867914 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490837880149 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.