"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is a controversial that whether the government should provide funding for the health treatment or invests money on health education and conservative solutions. This essay agrees that more fund must essential for health education and preventive measures.
To begin with, providing more funding for health education is beneficial. Firstly, schools can spread the awareness about health. Teachers should teach their students about food and pollution. They must teach to students what to eat or not, teach them to use renewable resources rather than non-renewable resources. Because, fossil fuels emit carbon dioxide, which have indirectly effect to the human body and people become ill. Secondly, the authorities should encourage the citizens to do more exercises by doing health awareness campaigns. For example, one survey has been done by WHO claims that people of Amsterdam are healthier than other nations, because they ride bicycles instead of cars. Therefore, spending money on health education is curbing the health problems.
Moreover, the government should improve public facilities, so citizens opt public transports to commute from one place to another instead of using private vehicles. So, overall air pollution can be reduced and it stops health diseases. Finally, junk foods should be shunned by the local authorities. Thus, people cannot be affected by obesity. In one study found that 30% of the world's population remain healthy because they are eating hygiene foods.
In conclusion, I deem that the government should distribute more money on health education and preventive measures as these are much effective for curbing a health problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the government should provide funding for the health treatment or invests mone...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To begin with, providing more funding for health education is beneficial. Firs...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should teach their students about food and pollution. They must teach to studen...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... They must teach to students what to eat or not, teach them to use renewable reso...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il fuels emit carbon dioxide, which have indirectly effect to the human body and ...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
... carbon dioxide, which have indirectly effect to the human body and people become ill...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide bicycles instead of cars. Therefore, spending money on health education is cu...
^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ity. In one study found that 30% of the worlds population remain healthy because they ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59215686275 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69767439394 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1179230233 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254456887957 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08584596343 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706877463682 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166677140392 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057017350175 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.