Professional sports are a very large industry in the world today. The most elite players can get contracts worth many millions of dollars. Some say there is too much money in sports and that it defeats the purpose of the actual game.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Sport has always been a part of life since the ancient. In the modern world sport is a serious industry of the world due to elite participants have a large impact on the media. Some people claim that talented players has received the contracts which has made them a millions of dollars and it is fading the purpose of the sport. While others say it is worth what players have spent. From my point of view, I believe that extra income of elite players is acceptable due to some reasons.
On the one hand, sport players nowadays are treated like celebrities. Some of top players receive advertisement deals and that earn them an excesses amount of money. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo is an elite footballer who earn millions of dollars per year from companies want him to become a brand ambassador. And that large amount of money goes to the area which not has an impressive impact to people lives. In contrast, education, healthy and transportation are things that private company are not keen on and they are under estimate.
On the other hand, professional players obtain a great sums of money is a fair income for how hard they have tried. Firstly, there are many players over the world in many sport such as soccer, baseball, basketball, etc. However, just a minority become a perfect players. For instance, Michael Jordan is a professional basketball player who collaborate with Nike creates Jordan shoes brand has impressive achievements in his life. Secondly, the best players are watched by millions of people, which make them be a perfect model in their area and inspired people to become like him or her. Last but not least, that is the fair rewards for how hard-working are they.
In conclusion, although there are an enormous amount of money earned by professional sport players which can be used for society, they still worth to receive a fair amount of advertisement charge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'a million'
Suggestion: a million
...eived the contracts which has made them a millions of dollars and it is fading the purpose...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a million' or simply 'millions'?
Suggestion: a million; millions
...eived the contracts which has made them a millions of dollars and it is fading the purpose...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... it is fading the purpose of the sport. While others say it is worth what players hav...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sport seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sports'.
Suggestion: many sports
...here are many players over the world in many sport such as soccer, baseball, basketball, e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'player'?
Suggestion: player
...wever, just a minority become a perfect players. For instance, Michael Jordan is a prof...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...clusion, although there are an enormous amount of money earned by professional sport p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83076923077 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62109060819 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526153846154 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9217330436 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3529411765 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272139027452 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852147699472 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645698153032 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171908914518 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753307104703 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.