Protecting dolphins
Many people are against training Dolphins – type of marine mammal, to perform in the circus because it may injure these animals and I agree that.
In former times, dolphins are fascinating to many people and helping people have been reported. But today, the human against training Dolphins to perform in the circus, It’s one of life’s little luxuries. Many specialists are against using dolphins for entertainment, medical, treatment, or any other purpose. But it's not like humans can speak dolphins. We're very different creatures. So how do they do it?
The human will train dolphins by caning, hitting, knocking,… which makes dolphins injured. Searching Google “How do you train a dolphin”, you will know strict training. For example, the dolphin may first be rewarded for swimming through a hoop. Then the hoop is raised so it's at the top of the water, continue until success. Once the new goal is achieved, the dolphin is then only rewarded for the more advanced task. After I read that, I feel indignant with the human about training dolphins. Why are we doing like that even is sinister? Dolphins is our friend, we should save it. Dolphins don’t belong to anyone, they belong to natural.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...in dolphins by caning, hitting, knocking,… which makes dolphins injured. Searching...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...makes dolphins injured. Searching Google 'How do you train a dolphin', ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 202.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06435643564 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63506346317 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663366336634 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8307687239 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9375 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.625 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24598141634 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830537865362 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724377059741 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164889246983 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566967733979 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.18 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.