Question: Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The interim zeitgeist dictates that men are innately more combative than women. From my perspective, it is high time we obliterated this entrenched notion and acknowledged the potential of females.
To begin with, we all have to concede that males are not more belligerent than their counterparts in embryo; rather, it is the ubiquitous fixated conception that constitutes this cachet. Any male-dominated communities deem men ambitious: should they fail to live up to these expectations, they will likely be despised for being unable to strut their valor and masculine characteristics. The hopes pinned onto men render them susceptible to the word “blunderer” or “fiasco” and also inflates their self-esteem. Therefore, men’s predilection is to manifest their aspirations and realize them.
On the other hand, females’ propensity is to fend for their families and children. They are the only ones that can birth and nurture kids. This penchant explicates why they have chosen to step back since the time of matriarchy and let men be the breadwinner in their stead nowadays. However, no way can any misogynistic individuals blame females for being too lackadaisical, irresolute or dovish to shoulder great responsibilities; they just have yet found a reason to do so. Taylor Swift, as known as “the music industry” or Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao, an intrepid and distinguished leading figure in Vietnamese entrepreneurship are notable emblems to gainsay the antagonistic statement. Besides, women’s statuses have rocketed today in the provisional hierarchy in which males still think that is in the palm of their hands, notwithstanding their congenital frail constitution compared to that of men. Patriarchs should remember the reason women became reserved and nonchalant to power was that it benefited the society; had it not been for their muscles and abdomens, there would be no way round for men to show off their conservativeness. In addition, the drastic shift incentivized by industrialization and urban sprawl has made them redoubtable components to males, demonstrating that though men do not want women to pull their weight, nothing can stop them.
To encapsulate, women are just as talented and resourceful as men, they also possess empathy and perseverance, which males often lack that can assure their success. People should reckon that household chores or rearing obligations can not tether these women’s moves anymore. The alteration and need of the collective whole are not entitled to squander anyone’s aptitudes: it is time to change our outmoded idea.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, still, therefore, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48258706468 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24014309316 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624378109453 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7694835382 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.647058824 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6470588235 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122039255528 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043515256744 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480473923135 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860088197576 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02033397524 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.