In recent years, the family structure has changed as well as family roles. What types of changes are occurring? do you think these changes are positive or negative?
In this day and age, the topic of changes in family organization is one which bears some consideration. It is the opinion of this writer that the greater wisdom is on the side of those who believe these changes bring about huge benefits.
Family organization has undergone two main differences compared to the past. The first factor influencing family roles is the fact that in a nuclear family, there can be more than one breadwinner. Due to economic burdens modern society places on citizens, it's hard for just one person to secure the whole family's financial issues. The elimination of generation gap is also a great contribution to the structure of family nowadays. This is attributed to the development of electronic media, which provides people with easier communication and helps to tighten relationships.
On the question of whether it is harmful or not, this writer takes the view that these dissimilarities are considered as progressive changes. From a humane perspective, both men and women having to earn the living leads to the abolishment of gender discrimination from all over the world. Moreover, since family members play a vital role in individuals' lives, getting on well with them is a key component to avoid mental breakdowns and psychological disorders. According to a survey conducted by experts in the field, 7o% of the children who usually confide to their parents tend to have optimistic attitudes towards life and deal with difficulties easily.
Thus, it can be seen that diminishing generation gap and the financial contribution from both men and women in families are the two main positive changes occurring. Therefore, it should have been abundantly demonstrated that these differences are prominent to society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...d helps to tighten relationships. On the question of whether it is harmful or not, this writer takes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... demonstrated that these differences are prominent to society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22775800712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06766932767 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5061748433 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203241276989 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662221998318 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554985059658 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126065666098 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537777963662 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.