In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places, such as: bars, restaurants and offices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places?
It is no doubt that smoking plays a crucial role in the lives of many people. This leads to an increasing number of citizens are suffering from disease smoking caused. Therefore, the local authority launches several laws to forbid smoking in public spaces. However, while I believe that such laws are chiefly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on people who run a business at public places.
First of all, smoking restriction law brings a fresh environment for each individual person. This is because public areas are constantly overcrowded with full of customers so when a person smokes in a coffee shop, for example, the surrounding guesses will exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Consequently, the perceived wrongdoing of a few people had raised the number of patients who are suffer from diseases by secondhand smoking.
On the other hand, the effect that limit smoking has had on business can only be seen as negative. Rather than individual people enjoy public spaces, they are instead choosing to take more interest at home if the laws are effective. As a result, it can quickly affect the turnover of that business. Furthermore, the decision also diminishes the chance to meet and communication face to face with people who share common interest outside social networking sites.
In conclusion, although there is no doubt that smoking restriction law solves various problems related to cigarette smoke and improve the living environment for citizens. I believe that the government should more to try and limit the impaction by the law in order to promote the future of community life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...eople had raised the number of patients who are suffer from diseases by secondhand smok...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...d raised the number of patients who are suffer from diseases by secondhand smoking. O...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ieve that the government should more to try and limit the impaction by the law in order...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11152416357 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77549067533 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6225644311 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217839109555 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734187237866 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489129864854 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132771156581 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524659885846 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.