Recently some people can work from home using modern technology. Some think this only benefits the workers, but not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Recently some people can work from home using modern technology. Some think this only benefits the workers, but not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The role of technology in the world today is widely debated, with some people claiming that modern technology itself could diminish the distance between different workplaces’ locations and main office. It will provide easiness way for workers to share information with employers and colleagues. Personally, I do not feel that only workers obtain benefits from this modernity, and I will explain why in this essay.

Firstly, many companies are facing high competition in the same product market. The managers please hight quality interactive with their colleagues, for instance by sharing data immediately, fast searching and convenience to work outside the office. If all staffs can face together by video conference, they will not necessary to go through the traffic jam in the morning for working. In this case, employers no need to spend high budget for a large workspace and staffs will not suffer from sedentary lifestyle. Finally, computers have the ability to process the statistical data with high accuracy and response time. This is faster than work by man, and prevents the damage from stress which in itself could generate further social problems.

I do appreciate that some people think differently, saying that it is safer to send data in paper form. Because there are many concerns about documents hacking, also data losing when network is down. If the damaged information is secret or important, it would be worse and hard to recover all of them. Nevertheless, There are many feasible ways to establish databases’ security.

In conclusion, I tend to agree that it is wiser to use internet in the company, for reasons which benefit both workers and entrepreneur.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25830258303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83987598858 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5908758263 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17587814696 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506856985527 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606175818465 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990139351636 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337653372899 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.