Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether industrialized nations should or shouldn't provide jobs for talented and gifted workers who stem from underpriveleged area. Although there are many debatable opinion surrounding this phenomenon, I personally give a green light to the former statement and my rational conclusion will be scrutinized in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, I believe that any genius people should have a chance to promote their career path in the rich countries. Firstly, working in the industrialized nations can help the talented employees meet more criteria for the development of their career. They can gain opportunity to immerse themselves in professional working environment and access the up to date equipment which is served for their job. Secondly, the salary from developed nations is much more higher than the others, which is the determining factor to make gifted workers feel the sense of job satisfaction. Moreover, the huge salary can make these people feel their talent and effort are worth and also raise the productivity. Thirdly, opening a door for skilled employees to working is not only improve themselves but also our industrialized nations. It is obvious that with the knowledgeable worker in the labor force, these nations may become more prestige and powerful. For instance, the rich region such as US provide a range of scholarships and job opportunities for skilled employees in order to raise their prosper.
On the other hands, this permission can cause some negative social phenomenon such as brain drain, lack of skilled employees to help their own nations mitigate the poverty problem. To be clear, if all the talented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote their career, their own country continue to live in the underpriveleged situation. Furthermore, the government in developing country subsidize a tremendous money to create a chance for genius people to study in the rich nations with a hope that these people will return and contribute their attainments to develop their own country. Without the skilled workers, it is hard for government to make the nation more powerful. Finally, the skilled employee can be seen as the irresponsible people in the process of economic reconstruction.
In conclusion, this trend has both pros and cons. It all comes down that the rich nations should provide a job for gifted workers to promote a job path and meet the job satisfaction. However, I believe that the gifted employees can combined working in the rich nations for a while and spend a remain time to return and contribute their effort for their own nations.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...hether industrialized nations should or shouldnt provide jobs for talented and gifted wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e salary from developed nations is much more higher than the others, which is the determini...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...he talented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote t...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e talented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote th...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Move
...alented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote their c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'tremendous money'.
Suggestion: tremendous money
...ernment in developing country subsidize a tremendous money to create a chance for genius people to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the rich nations for a while and spend a remain time to return and contribute their eff...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94404367928 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.45684263 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231209700497 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742600298817 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555195144189 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146673138656 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274268165059 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...hether industrialized nations should or shouldnt provide jobs for talented and gifted wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e salary from developed nations is much more higher than the others, which is the determini...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...he talented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote t...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e talented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote th...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Move
...alented designers, doctors, teachers,.. move to another countries to promote their c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'tremendous money'.
Suggestion: tremendous money
...ernment in developing country subsidize a tremendous money to create a chance for genius people to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the rich nations for a while and spend a remain time to return and contribute their eff...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94404367928 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.45684263 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.157894737 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231209700497 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742600298817 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555195144189 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146673138656 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274268165059 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.