A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced?
It is true that the rapid development of an integrating economy leads to people have the higher standard of living, whereas the gap between cities and rural areas is wider than the past. There are various negative effects because of these developments, and there are numerous solutions to tackle these problems.
On the other hand, the fast- changing economy of the developed regions created some predominant problems. To begin with, dwellers in the undeveloped region tend to migrate to the big cities with the aim of better lives, such as seeking the high paid jobs or better education and health services; therefore; the cities seemed to be over- populated leading to traffic jam, environmental pollution, and the pressure on infrastructure and services. For instance, traffic jam in the developed cities at peak hours was obvious because of these high population rates. In addition, a widening gap between urban areas and countryside made the people living in the rural areas feel dissatisfied and unfair. To be specific, the city dwellers had countless destinations to entertain as theaters, shopping malls, and parks; while the people who lived in remote areas were rather hard to make ends meet every day.
On the other hand, there are some suggestions to narrow the gap between urban and rural areas. Firstly, the Government should invest a great deal of money to build the public works as hospitals, school, and amusement parks to fulfil the rural dwellers’ needs. Also, it will reduce the pressure on infrastructure in the developed cities. Secondly, the authorities should give the appropriate policies to attract business to invest on constructing the industrial zones in the undeveloped regions. Thus, residents in these regions will tend to come back their hometown because it creates more jobs for them with higher salaries.
In conclusion, the higher standard of living in the cities has negative effects on the small areas, so it seems to be that many solutions of the Government to resolve these situations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18844984802 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78354739563 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.2997786813 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136962090251 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461418166983 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452865726145 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939392488806 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042109471836 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.