In most educational institutions, female students are prone to get involved in arts-related subjects like languages or music rather than science subjects like math or physics as their male counterparts often select. I suppose the 2 main reasons behind this phenomenon are radically different personalities of each gender as well as the orientation of society. From a personal point of view, this tendency should not be changed.
There are two explanations for the difference between girls' and boys’ choice of subjects. Firstly, gender-linked traits seem to play an essential role in creating the trend. Accordingly, girls are usually sensitive and sympathetic, therefore, they feel more interested in arts subjects that ease their vulnerable emotions such as drawing and music. However, boys are mostly at the opposite, who are more robust and rational, as a result, they are more suitable in studying science subjects, which require logical thinking most of the time. Besides, I do believe that society as a whole is also an inevitable reason in directing boys to engage in science rather than arts subjects. For example, a majority of Vietnamese parents encourage their sons to choose maths, physics, or chemistry to spend most of their school time on since they believe that these subjects will sharply support their sons’ future careers.
Personally, I affirm that no measurements should be or can be applied to adjust such an inclination. Firstly, this trend should not be changed because each gender has its own decisions that impinge on his or her life which must not be interrupted. Secondly, the tendency might hardly be altered due to the demands of society as a whole. In every corner of the world, they do need women who are more likely to succeed act learning psychology and satisfying people with their gentle inborn quality. Conversely, we all need men with logical minds and scientific knowledge to enhance devices as well as our living standards.
In conclusion, there are 2 causes explaining the selection of subjects between boys and girls, which ultimately, should not and could not be changed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19241982507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82130194489 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6017740099 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.733333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28795604004 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865168449857 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532498360424 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152652432653 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392422951396 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.