In most educational institutions, female students are prone to get involved in arts subjects rather than science as their male counterparts often choose. I suppose that the 2 main reasons behind this phenomenon are sexual characteristics and the orientation of society. From a personal point of view, this tendency should not and may not be changed.
There are 2 explanations for the different choices of subjects between boys and girls. Firstly, gender-linked traits seem to plan an essential role. Accordingly, females are usually sensitive and sympathetic, therefore, they feel more interested in arts subjects such as drawing and psychology that ease their vulnerable emotions. On the contrary, male students are mostly at the opposite, who are more robust and rational, as a result, they are more suitable for learning science subjects which require logical thinking. Besides, society as a whole also remarkably contributes to the rise of this tendency. For example, most Vietnamese parents encourage their sons to study maths, physics, and chemistry since they believe that these subjects will support their children’s future careers.
Personally, I affirm that the discrepancy in the subject selection of boys and girls should not and could hardly be changed. Firstly, each gender has the rights to make decisions that impinge his or her happiness and later life, which should never be interrupted. Secondly, the tendency might not only be changed due to the mentioned but also because of the social demands. In every corner of the world, people need women who are more likely to succeed at learning psychology and satisfying people by their gentle inborn quality. Conversely, we all need men whose minds are more probably be logical and open to enhancing devices and technology, hence, improve our living standards.
In conclusion, there are 2 possible interprets for the difference between boys’ and girls’ choice of subjects, which should not and could not be changed due to personal privileges as well as demands of the whole world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, conversely, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32307692308 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83497346658 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2472712498 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215378923595 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708375169724 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053303545632 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136842295652 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398465081741 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.