Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teching skills that can help students find a job. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon has aroused wide concern over accurate curriculum of education. Many human kinds think that traditional school subjects should be limited in order to increase teaching of professional subjects, while others approve mainly general system of studying. In my aspects of illustration, general subjects are crucial in future of individual. The importance of traditional subjects rather than specialized ones will be discussed below before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Teaching traditional subjects create several advantages to officials and people. It has been claimed that learning general subjects such as history indicates the real experiences that were in the past. Besides that, knowledge is taken in the terms of patriotism and the lifestyle of ancestors is valued, also nationality will become stronger. For example, most of great heads of a country were people with powerful experience in humanitarian fields. Additionally, for individual, this tendency gives wide outlook for an appropriate position in society. Thus, studying general subjects are much more beneficial than emphasizing on specialized ones.
However, extra professional subjects are essential for future labor market of youth. Because of nowadays challenging competition to a workplace, the long term preparation is needed, especially, from school years. Moreover, practical area should be established in colleges parallel with theoretical side for students’ achievements. For instance, many companies ask not only about knowledge they hace gained but also the practical experiences. Therefore, acceptance of subjects that will be required in jobs should be vital.
To conclude, allocating time to teaching skills that can ease their work process might be important. Nevertheless, traditional subjects should be applied as advantages overweight that of professionals’.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ample, most of great heads of a country were people with powerful experience in huma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99259259259 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22091075908 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659259259259 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1005508433 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1764705882 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179604885001 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524400414418 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405694035196 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109637038439 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287886839891 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.