Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subjects which do not adequately prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern working world To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subjects which do not adequately prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern working world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Schooling plays a vital role in the life of children. It prepares them for their bright future. However, some people think that the subjects which are traditionally taught in schools with a lot of emphasis do not make students prepared enough to fulfill the demands of the working world in this modernized era. I agree to this without any doubt and would like to discuss it further.

To begin with, today’s world is majorly technology oriented. Computers are taking over almost everything that humans used to do manually before. What I mean to say here is that almost every common thing that people do or use these days has artificial intelligence which is programmed to take the decisions without human intervention. Therefore, children need to be familiar with such subjects which can make their brains think innovatively and logically. There are so many programming languages like C++, Java, Python etcetera, which are being used intensively these days to program things like a microwave over, a smart television and so on. As a matter of fact, such languages are not difficult to grasp and even the kids learning subjects of ninth standard can become proficient in them.

Moving further, if I talk about the subjects which are taught like Science, Maths, English and many more, these subjects are although necessary but do not have a lot of significance in the working life. To exemplify, consider the professions which are lucrative these days like a software developer or a web designer. People in these fields are earning a lot and do they apply the laws of physics or do they use the chemical reactions or do they need to know about the battles fought by their ancestors, to make their product? Definitely no. Despite knowing the trends of the industry, there are very few schools which are preparing their pupils to at least become competitive in the world and successful later.

To conclude, I would say that schools should focus on those subjects which can give their students a place to stand the cut-throat competition in this contemporary age and not those subjects which are not even going to be remembered by them in future.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are although necessary but do not have a lot of significance in the working lif...
^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...not even going to be remembered by them in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, at least, i mean, as a matter of fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94214876033 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.683294583 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2522241641 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256862531193 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775326361611 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071686567973 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167298064478 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748714520966 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.