Science and technology are more important than history
A few individuals belive that learning science and technology is more important than acquiring historical knowledge. Although, in my opinion, STEM subjects are vital in the current world, knowing the past is crucial as it helps to avoid mistakes of the bygone era.
On the one hand, some postulate that science and technology are the most important subjects, as they lead to innovation. The modern world is based on progress, as daily discoveries are made leading to the digitalisation and computerisation of manufacturing, medicine and education. For instance, these days, teachers more often than ever before, are replaced by online resources, as children are able to access a plethora of information online. Therefore, not following modern trends in developing resources might mean that some people stay behind and their knowledge becomes inadequate.
On the other hand, knowing history is crucial as it not only explains how nations got to where they are, but also helps to prevent repeating past mistakes, irregardless of how irrelevant the bygone eras might seem to be. For example, having the knowledge of previous wars and how devastating they were, should be a lesson to all nations, as well as encouragement not yo repeat the same mistakes. This learning history has a capacity of creating a better future.
In conclusion, despite history and technology subjects helping people to keep up with the modern progress, awareness of history is a necessity as it helps current generation to learn from mistakes of their forefathers. Therefore both disciplines are equally important and should be thought alongside each other to deliver the best result for the individual as well as society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...arn from mistakes of their forefathers. Therefore both disciplines are equally important ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28782287823 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96344655687 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2757574672 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.272727273 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275158623768 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978783877852 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126155425155 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158609153586 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762923016913 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.