There is an existing argument that, governments should be responsible to conduct and regulate scientific research, rather than private companies. I will compleatetely agree with the statement, because governmental execution and control will improve the effectiveness and desired outcomes exponentially.
Sientific researches are crucial to explore existing scientific questions and find out new solutions. Government's should take part in this type of researches as it will provide enumerous benefits to the public and will increase the image of the country. Governmental involvements will provide necessary funds and human resources,hence it will improve the effectiveness of researches. For example ; recent researches conducted by government of India regarding polio vaccine, proved that 'it may cause harm in vaccinated children than non vaccinated!. If the researches were conducted by private agencies, they will try to hide the results that will reduce their income, incontrast, governments are more concerned about public, there for it should be handled by governmental agencies.
On the other hand, Control of researches are essential to guide it in a proper way, enuring the maximum output and reducing the potential harms arising from it. Government's are better in these aspects too,as they can impose laws to protect the rights of the people and environment taking part in the research. Public authorities will be more reliable in terms of right protection and efficency of the research. For example when public authorities involved in researches they will make strong concern about the possible harm arising from it, unlike private firms are solely focus on profit making. In addition, public authorities are more concerned about the environmental protection and it will improve the results abruptly.
Overall, scientific researches should be carried out by governmental agencies to provide optimum outputs. Public supervision can protect the ethical concerns and veracity of researches while assuring the cost effectiveness simultaneously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is an existing argument that, governments should be responsible to con...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tatement, because governmental execution and control will improve the effectivene...
^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lutions. Governments should take part in this type of researches as it will provi...
^^
Line 2, column 723, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hence
...ernments are more concerned about public,hence it should be handled by governmental ag...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of researches are essential to guide it in a proper way, enuring the maximum output and reducin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...a private company is doing any research the they will only focus on their benefits and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... improve the results abruptly. Overall, scientific researches should be carried ...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...port and guidance to researches to move in a proper way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, regarding, so, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62711864407 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0754675629 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552542372881 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7336506129 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30257283614 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111146009391 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102197515234 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211919881343 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072272927072 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.