Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the best ways to cope with perpetrators. Personally, I fully support the view that it is not incarceration but education and vocational training that are the most optimal methods to reform the outlaws.
There are a number of reasons why providing criminals with educational programs and skills training could play a significant role in the drop of crime rate and recidivism. In reality, poor education and job skills could potentially hinder people’s employability and lead to their participation in unlawful acts. For this reason, should the delinquents be enabled to receive education and job training, they will find it easier to apply for a job serving a prison sentence. A stable employment with regular income would undoubtedly discourage them from engaging in illegal activities. It should also be noted that imprisonment might become counter-productive because criminals when being mixed with other inmates could become more dangerous after being released. The safety of the whole society would in turn be put at risk.
Proponents of the above-mentioned arguments believe that sentencing the law violators to jail is the best way to deal with them. Once they are held responsible for their misdeeds, the social justice system will be maintained. Besides, it is perceived that educational and vocational courses may not be sufficient to turn them into productive members of the society after leaving the gaol. Nonetheless, they ignore the fact that some criminal acts are not deliberate; those who commit petty crimes do not deserve retribution. Incarcerating them could be costly; instead, the money should be channeled into other key sectors such as education and medical sectors to enhance living standard of the general public. What is more, an ex-prisoner with a criminal record might be treated unfairly, making them being unable to reintegrate into society. Accordingly, the ultimate purpose of prison to rehabilitate criminals fails to materialize.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, I would contend that providing offenders with education and job skills are more viable solutions to criminality. Prison therefore should be the last resort for those who break the law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ctors to enhance living standard of the general public. What is more, an ex-prisoner with a cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39541547278 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99645250199 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590257879656 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2533893833 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.764705882 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263924219309 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831600610485 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505383498985 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154798183726 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471160501559 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.