Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The issue of whether ancient buildings are relics of the past and should be preserved or superseded by modern buildings whose apperance might open a new horizon for the development of a nation has been a highly debated topic recently. While there is a strong case for the latter viewpoint, I am more inclined to the latter due to its validity.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why many people argue that these old houses need to be knocked down and alternated. Firstly, in case of derelict ones, such experience of living in these shelters could be quite a nightmare to quite a few people. For instance, citizens of Hoi An are suffering frome a low-quality life in ancient streets. It is a common-scene to some that three to four households have only one toilet system with their walls painting layers bound to peel off and their ceilings sagging owing to weathering. Moreover, opponents have their points in the belief that these old, unsafe and dirty buildings should be demolished to give way to skyscapers to accommodate an ever-increasing number of people flocking to the city in hope for a better life. In this case, modern complex structures is an alternative approach to deal with the explosion of population in rural areas.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that the heritage sites are corrolated to the reservoir of the glorious past of a nation. Philosophically speaking, like a person who clings to the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future,a city itself entails an inextricable link of these three time axes to revise, thrive and fly. Another rationale would be that these historical monuments serve as amental panacea for hurry-sickness city dwellers and embodiment, symbolic of the unique architecture. Hardly can modern day artist recreate such beauties as that by famous ancestral architects of yesterdays who utilized the past materials and for that reason, some streets adorned with second-to-none buildings are ideal destination for the visitors worldwide to save themselves in the sense of serence old days. To those who are obsessed with the bustle and hustle of metropolitian life, these tiny ancient houses resemble oases to ease their stress.
In conclusion, while it stands undeniable that each ideas has its own reasoning, from my perspective, the presence of ancient buildings is essential to the survival of any city for their originality and mesmeriziable destinations of travel lovers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...w people. For instance, citizens of Hoi An are suffering frome a low-quality life in a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...ent to enjoy and contemplates the future,a city itself entails an inextricable lin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09512195122 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90897501425 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582926829268 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4371112172 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.214285714 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178780792464 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550698708081 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046482967254 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11074208617 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205888669544 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.