Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge even a voluntary charge be levied for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion

Attending an exhibition is absolutely a considerable choice to relax. Some museums are free of charge for visitors; whereas, others require entry fee for visitying. This essay will compare both conducts and express my opinion on the issue of charging for entrance to an exhibition.

A numerous museums in the world are free for the public. For instance, the Brisbane Marinal History Museum charges no fee for entrying. The advantage of free museum is that it attracts more visitors; however, the disadvantage could be that the museum lacks this part of income for maintainance.

By contrast, a multiple of art exhibitions charge attendants for entrance fee. This is mainly because the art pieces are personal property. Apparently, the tickets deter certain people from appreciating the arts. If the show can be free, more art lovers will benifit from it. On the other hand, the profit generated from tickets facilitates profeliation of art by allowing the artist works on art as a full time job.

From my perspective of view, I think that all museums and art galleries should be free to public. The reason is free of entrence will appeal more visitors and the payment for maintainance can be covered by selling souvenires and arts. As a matter of fact, visitors always buy souvenires after visiting a museum.

To recapitulate, I believe every exhibition should not charge the attendant for tickets since this act would impede people from enjoy the exhibition. Besides, the museum and art gallery surely can resolve the feficit of income from tickets by selling its products.

Votes
Average: 7 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'museum'?
Suggestion: museum
...ntrance to an exhibition. A numerous museums in the world are free for the public. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...y allowing the artist works on art as a full time job. From my perspective of view, I ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be free to public. The reason is free of entrence will appeal more visitors and t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, however, if, so, whereas, for instance, i think, as a matter of fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10384615385 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76136436134 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9573588141 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350703461633 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122447366396 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798265366412 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205168623466 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560545418488 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.