Smacking children is the best form of discipline.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Smacking children has become increasingly unpopular among certain demographics of society. These people believe that by smocking the children could make them being a discipline person. This essay will argue that smacking children to make them obey and behave is completely unnecessary.
Parents always wanted their children have a good behavior and obey everything that they said. They are justifiably thought that by using physical approach will make their children more discipline. Indeed, if the children doing something wrong such come late from school, not doing homework, or not clean up their bedroom. By giving the children a punishment, hopefully make the children change those bad habits. This is a basic reason for parents to give the children physical punishment.
In other hands, giving a physical punishment to the children has a bad impact, especially for their psychology. Moreover, smacking children has a potential to make them suffering by trauma if the parents doing it not in a proper way. Not only for their psychology, can the physical punishment also harm their physic. Ironically if it makes them bleed. Of course, it is something that needs to avoid. Alternatively, the parents have to find other ways to teach their children, for example by giving them a good motivation word and if they worth to punish, the parents can reduce their pocket money.
This essay argued that people who smacking their children to make them more discipline and behave have a flawed understanding in raising their children. Furthermore, it can be dangerous to their psychology and physic. In my opinion, smacking children is not an absolute imperative that is entirely justified despite the small benefit involved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g by trauma if the parents doing it not in a proper way. Not only for their psychology, can the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29454545455 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76252609277 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2274408594 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153416804834 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616849013385 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449835510157 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11339966202 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292987982153 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.