Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree?
Indirect smoking can have a fatal symptom as much as direct smoking. As a result of this, some people claims that the public smoking should be banned. In my opinion, I completely agree with this claim.
People can be harmed physically from inhaling toxic smokes in public places; public ban seems only option to prevent non-smokers. If the country banned the smoking at public places, people can inhale fresh air and can enjoy clean atmosphere. Therefore, for the non-smoker’s health issues, it is reasonable to ban the public smoking.
However, against ban with the public smoking have several reasons. First and foremost reason, smokers have not had a place to smoke anywhere else in the world if the public smoking is banned. Secondly, it would be reasonable to build more of smoking booths in public areas before banning smokers. Without installation of relevant facilities mean forcing smokers to quit the smoking and which are impossible to achieve. Therefore, just banning the public smoking is unrealistic and unreasonable.
In my opinion, public smoking should be banned regardless the consequences of smokers. The health risks for non-smokers are worth considering for; because they have to inhale the toxic smoking is bad as direct smoking. By inhaling a bi of smokes from other smokers in public areas, non-smokers may face the fatal diseases such as lungs and heart cancers. For example, 60% of US people diagnosis the symptom of smokers due to indirect smoking. Even though the smokers claim about the insufficient places to smoke, the health of non-smokers is more important. Hence, the public smoking ban should be preceded.
In conclusion, the public booths sound practical and reasonable before banning the public smoking. However, the physical influences by indirect smoking are more damaging to non-smokers before the operating of public booths. Therefore, banning the public smoking would be the only possibility to secure non-smoker’s health.
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249307479224 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.14404432133 0.155533422707 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.13296398892 0.0946595960268 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0470914127424 0.0501214627716 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016620498615 0.0437548338989 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116343490305 0.122226691241 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0415512465374 0.0403226058552 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82015079704 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0304709141274 0.0326793684256 93% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0886426592798 0.0861772015684 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0277008310249 0.021408717616 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00277008310249 0.011925033212 23% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1979.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32268370607 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.476038338658 0.374742101984 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316293929712 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191693290735 0.203846283523 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108626198083 0.137316102897 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82015079704 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482428115016 0.56093040696 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.1140378229 60.7387585426 79% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.65 20.7743622355 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9949995191 49.517814964 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.95 127.492653851 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.7743622355 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.814263465372 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 47.2793929712 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.96 1.69124875643 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341703070477 0.332605444948 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117765923375 0.102741220458 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0510940537915 0.0668466124924 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578892374329 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0992211879285 0.148594505496 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161320842377 0.134430193775 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639491009808 0.0742795772207 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.423804554507 0.324371583561 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.132384091142 0.0638462369009 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2489620086 0.228012699653 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413554210445 0.058150111329 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.5751503006 349% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.