New inventions are always gifted to the world by researchers; however, some people hold that most of them are unnecessary and waste both time and money. Of course, some of those experiments should certainly be discouraged as they harm the world, while many of them are indeed vital for the existence of the humankind and should therefore be encouraged.
If experiments had not been carried out, the world would have been completely different to what we see today. Medical researches, for instance, have offered mankind a chance to live longer by inventing endless modern drug therapies to fight deadly diseases such as cancers, ischemic heart diseases and cerebrovascular accidents. Likewise, novel biomedical equipment, such as scanners, blood sample processors and surgical instruments, have long been associated with decreasing morbidity and mortality of affected patients. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University, in which they claim that five year survival rate of carcinomas has dramatically increased over the past 10 years.
However, instead of giving better life to all living beings, some new findings and creations deteriorate the quality of human life and the environment as well. For example, military equipment and weapons kill people, pollute the environment and destroy the harmony. Even though, biological weapons have not been used so far, studies are going on secretly in view of future use if a need arises. For these studies wealthy nations invest a lot of money, which is completely a wastage and should thereby be terminated.
In conclusion, most of the scientific experiments are ethical and are designed for the betterment of humans as opposed to fewer studies, whereby the whole world could be damaged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35611510791 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86193750803 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658273381295 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9576483099 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870030845694 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318549996367 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437739565039 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0511379314195 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347850600267 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.