Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest possible solutions?
It is true that new staff of a few enterprises does not have elemental social expertise especially coordinated skill. There are some reasons behind this phenomenon and several measures could be coped with this potential issue.
There are two key reasons why new members of companies were equipped with necessary interpersonal skills. Firstly, the lack of basic personal skills of laborers results from spending a great amount of time studying their major in their universities without learning practical skills such as cooperative skills. This is because the educational program of many countries may be prior to educating the theory in class than carrying out social activities. Therefore they might not have more chances to cooperate with other classmates in exercises. Another reason will include depending on the technology that gives rise to both benefits and drawbacks to youngsters. It results in people can telecommunicate or be self-study at their home via digital devices instead of going to offices or schools instead of coordinating with co-workers as well as learning in groups. Consequently, they may be not working with other employees in the team when they start a new job in a strange working environment.
To cope with this problem, the authorities of these nations should renovate the educational system in which students are allowed to opt for the main major together with other subjects that focus on social skills that can help them in the later profession rather than studying all disciplines. In addition, colleges could organize extra classes courses to provide learners more chances to practice with other ones. As a result, they can accumulate working experiences for their future career path. The second measure could be for employers to hire merit-based employees who not only are qualified professionals but also have more practical skills than recruit individuals with good qualifications.
To sum up, new laborers of enterprise nowadays might not have teamwork skills because of the reasons mentioned above. Therefore there are some solutions to deal with this trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ss than carrying out social activities. Therefore they might not have more chances to coo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 995, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w job in a strange working environment. To cope with this problem, the authoriti...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...because of the reasons mentioned above. Therefore there are some solutions to deal with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35347432024 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85911719999 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598187311178 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3337523794 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.133333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185816430376 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618389994537 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660125926649 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118587463081 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396954685386 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.