Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings. People think that they are free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
House designing freedom has been highlighted as an emerging issue, escaping broader public attention for its ramifications on societies. Although the advantages could be pronounced, they could be outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, house designing freedom could be fraught with pitfalls. First, if people design building based on their personal preferences, the inconsistency in building design would ensue, damaging the fang shui of the city, which could bring bad luck for the surrounding areas. For example, the Communist Bank Tower in HongKong was contructed with the sharp angles cutting the flow of fang shui, consequently the surrounding corporations were riddled with financial insecurities, corporate collapse and bankruptcies. Second, Housing design without strict and universal bulding codes could be susceptiable to damages or even collapse. For example, every house and office building in Japan all have foundations with compressed air in order to levitate when it comes to earthquake or other natural disasters, reducing casualties significantly.
On the other hand, house designing freedom could have many benefits. First, by designing houses without any oversight or control from official authorites, individuals could freely express their artistic taste and personal identity to the society. In addition, many buildings without any universal design and teeming with their own distinct design could give the region the impression of the idenity of uniqueness. It is implied that this could act as an incentive for tourism activities in the regions, increasing revenues for locals.
In conclusion, despite the upsides of personal identity and tourism, house designing freedom could be teeming with downsides of fang shui blocking and the threat of collapse. By complying with universal building rules, people could build houses or officies with higher security and stability.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75704225352 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92003753784 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0909536832 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166856508454 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740935911772 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409022315094 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116400276918 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292711597372 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.