In many cities around the world, people are using bicycles to travel and commute daily more than individual cars while in other cities, the number of cars being used surpasses the number of bicycles. There are a number of reasons lead to these trends recently and personally, I would have to support using more bicycles and cars for daily transporting purposes.
In many rich and developed nations such as western countries in European Union, especially in Holland, people prefer to use bicycles to transport daily thanks to good infrastructure established by the government and for health purposes. In these countries, besides the lanes for cars and big vehicles, there is always a dedicated lane for pedestrians and cyclists. By using this lane, cyclists feel safer when traveling and are not afraid to be interrupted by bigger vehicles such as individual cars or buses. In addition, cycling every day is a good way to get fit and improve mental health during the current busy and modern lifestyle. While commuting in cars forces people to sit for more than one hour per day, commuting by bicycle gives people an opportunity to perform physical activities, reduces stress, and saves them countless hours from gyms.
On the other hand, in developing countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, and many countries in Southeast Asia, cars are more preferred than bicycles. One of the major reasons for this development in these countries is that owning a car symbolizes richness and wealth. They consider that bicycle was a symbol of their past poverty and thanks to the economic growth, they can now switch from slow-moving and old-fashioned bicycles to fast and fancy cars. Moreover, the economy of these stills grows in the fast-paced, people need to travel faster and farther to do their work so cars are more suitable than bicycles.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that commuting by car is faster than by bicycle in most cases, I firmly believe that cycling will become trendier in coming years. It allows people to improve both their physical and mental health in the modern lifestyle. Another crucial benefit from using more bicycles than cars is that it can help to reduce the pollution level by consuming less gasoline. Therefore, I hope more and more cities encourage this development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03947368421 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63422367103 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6712974644 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249053042137 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904821590584 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584490614809 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167746441948 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396652089257 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.