Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that the governments in some countries permit their citizens to quit their jobs at any age they want. While it can create a fiercely competitive labor market for youngsters, I believe that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, an increasing number of young people are going to face unemployment because employers would rather hire old employees than young ones. Since with increasing age, the knowledge gained through experience increases so that the productivity of the workers also increases. Also, some young but lazy people who prefer not to work and rely on social welfare take advantage of this policy. Consequently, there is less chance for these countries’ economies to develop significantly.
On the other hand, I think that the positive aspects of this trend shadowed its negative aspects. Firstly, this trend can alleviate the strain put on public spending programs for the elderly, such as health care and pension. As old-aged people earn their own salaries, they are able to pay monthly bills and services without being dependent on the government. As a result, governments have extra money to spend on improving transports infrastructure or facilities at schools. Finally, if more and more people work to their 70s or even 80s, the economy will be boosted significantly because of rising labor force participation as well as work experience.
In conclusion, I would argue that the advantages of letting people work for as long as they want outweigh its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9156802243 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665306122449 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8636875511 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292260612448 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913178749138 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912757217155 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183408896637 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612221033862 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.